Current

Rome Prize Fellows and Projects

The American Academy in Rome awards the Rome Prize to a select group of artists and scholars, after an application process that begins in the fall of each year. The winners, announced in the spring, are invited to Rome to pursue their work in an atmosphere conducive to intellectual and artistic freedom, interdisciplinary exchange, and innovation. The 2011-12 Rome Prize winners are listed here with a brief project summary in their own words.

To download the brochure from the Rome Prize Ceremony held in New York on 13 April, 2011, announcing the 2011-2012 Rome Prize winners click here.

Expand All Collapse All

Renaissance and Early Modern Studies

Marian and Andrew Heiskell Pre-Doctoral Rome Prize
Bradford Albert Bouley

Department of History, Stanford University

Expand Collapse
Bradford Albert Bouley
Dissecting the Holy: Saintly Anatomy in Early Modern Italy

 

“I will complete the final phase of writing and researching my PhD dissertation while in Rome. Focusing on the autopsies performed on saints during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries in Italy, my work investigates the connection between religious belief and human anatomy.  The dissertation treats medical theories about the link between spirituality and anatomy, the means by which anatomy could help ‘prove’ sanctity to Catholic and Protestant contemporaries, the reception of medical ideas by lay people, and the ways in which doctors used the Church to promote their career. Early modern Rome, as both the religious and a medical center, is the focal point of this work. In fact, papal and Roman physicians contributed greatly to modern conceptions of anatomy. Thus, this project illustrates that the progress of understanding human anatomy was far from a secular endeavor and highlights a period of cooperation between science and religion.”
Collapse
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Post-Doctoral Rome Prize
Craig Martin

Associate Professor, Department of History, Oakland University

Expand Collapse
Craig Martin
Renaissance Italian Thought and the Religious Rejection of Aristotle

“This project examines the religious and intellectual contexts of polemical writings against Aristotle and his followers during the Scientific Revolution, by examining the legacy of Renaissance Italian natural philosophy. The rejection of Aristotelianism is widely considered to have been concomitant to the development of modern science. Its rejection had significant ramifications for Christianity, which had for centuries used Aristotelian concepts in its theology. To bolster their positions, proponents of new sciences used a variety of techniques to contend that Renaissance Italian natural philosophy was impious, irreligious, or even atheistic. Those who argued for alternatives to traditional natural philosophy tried to demonstrate its lack of orthodoxy by using historical, rhetorical, and philosophical arguments, many of which had origins in controversies of the Italian Renaissance.”

Collapse